🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' youth". Legislation is expected to be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an similar ban is "a potential options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a related move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged families to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic motion demanding a ban for under-16s without parental consent is given. Although it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these services, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a useful first step," commented the parliamentarian supporting the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in strong data".

Previously, support grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to further research the matter.

Charities have voiced warnings. One foundation established by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after encountering harmful online content contends that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to create products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, regulation is largely occurring at the regional level due to federal gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has signed a law barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed bills demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain figures to follow the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Views

Outside of these regions, other states are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies strike a more cautious position. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The body notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion evolves, the policies of the Australian government and others indicate that governments around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.